Please Remove Adblock
Adverts are the main source of Revenue for DoveMed. Please remove adblock to help us create the best medical content found on the Internet.

Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma

Last updated April 3, 2017

Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma is a genetic test that is helpful in aiding a diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma. The lab test results may also be subsequently useful in taking appropriate treatment decisions.

What are other Names for this Test? (Equivalent Terms)

  • Gene Mutation Analysis for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma
  • Molecular Testing for ESS
  • Test for Molecular Diagnosis of Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma

What is Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma? (Background Information)

  • Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma is a genetic test that is helpful in aiding a diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma. The lab test results may also be subsequently useful in taking appropriate treatment decisions
  • Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) comprise of a rare group of malignant uterine tumors that include the following types:
    • Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS)
    • High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS)
    • Undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS)
  • Endometrial stromal sarcoma is mostly present in adult women, and both pre- and post- menopausal women may be affected. The signs and symptoms of ESS include unusual vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and sensation of pressure in the pelvic area

The cause of endometrial stromal sarcoma is due to genetic mutations. Currently, studies indicate defects in the following genes:

  • Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma:
    • JAZF1-SUZ12(JJAZ1) fusion gene due to t(7;17)(p21;q15)
    • EPC1-PHF1 gene fusion
  • High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma:
    • Fusion of genes YWHAE and FAM22, due to chromosomal translocation, namely t(10;17)(q22;p13)
  • Undifferentiated uterine sarcoma:
    • Gains on chromosomes involving 2q, 4q, 6q, 7p, 9q, and 20q
    • Losses on chromosomes involving 3p, 10p, and 14q

The above genetic abnormalities can be detected using molecular studies, which may play a significant role in identifying the tumor type, and in some cases, helping the healthcare provider take appropriate treatment decisions.

The molecular testing, in general, can be performed using a variety of methods. Some of these methods include:

  • In situ hybridization technique, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS)
  • Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
  • Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)
  • Karyotyping including spectral karyotyping
  • mRNA analysis
  • Tissue microarrays (TMAs)
  • Southern blot test
  • Northern blot test
  • Western blot test
  • Eastern blot test

The methodology used for endometrial stromal sarcoma may vary from one laboratory to another. 

Note: Molecular testing has limitations due to the molecular method and genetic mutational abnormalities being tested. This can affect the results on a case-by-case basis. Consultation with your healthcare provider will help in determining the right test and right molecular method, based on individual circumstances.

What are the Clinical Indications for performing the Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma Test?

Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma is undertaken in the following situations:

  • To assist (and in some cases, confirm) the initial diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma
  • To distinguish other tumors/conditions that have similar histological features, when examined by a pathologist under the microscope
  • To help in determining treatment options
  • To confirm recurrence of the tumor: Tumor recurrence can either be at the original tumor site, or at a distant location (away from the initial site)

How is the Specimen Collected for Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma?

Following is the specimen collection process for Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma:

The specimen sample requirements may vary from lab to lab. Hence, it is important to contact the testing lab for exact specimen requirements, before initiating the testing process.

  • Sample required:
    • Fresh tumor tissue during biopsy
    • Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded solid tumor tissue (FFPE tumor tissue), often referred to as paraffin block of the tumor
    • Unstained tissue slides
  • Process of obtaining the sample: As outlined by the laboratory testing facility
  • Preparation required: As outlined by the laboratory testing facility


  • In some cases, a different source of specimen (such as peripheral blood, bone marrow biopsy specimen, or other body fluids) may be acceptable to the laboratory performing the test
  • Occasionally, additional samples may be required to either repeat the test or to perform follow-up testing
  • Depending on the location of testing, it may take up to 2 weeks’ turnaround time, to obtain the test results
  • Many hospitals preserve the paraffin blocks for at least 7 years. In general, older paraffin blocks (over 5 years) may affect the detection of specific mutations, due to degradation of the tumor specimen over time

Cost of Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma:

  • The cost of the test procedure depends on a variety of factors, such as the type of your health insurance, annual deductibles, co-pay requirements, out-of-network and in-network of your healthcare providers and healthcare facilities
  • In many cases, an estimate may be provided before the test is conducted. The final amount may depend upon the findings during the test procedure and post-operative care that is necessary (if any)

What is the Significance of the Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma Result?

The significance of Molecular Testing for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma is explained:

  • Presence of a positive test result helps aid, and in some cases, confirm the diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma
  • The result can help exclude other tumors with similar histological features
  • It can help determine the prognosis of the patient
  • In some cases, the test results may help in taking treatment decisions

The laboratory test results are NOT to be interpreted as results of a "stand-alone" test. The test results have to be interpreted after correlating with suitable clinical findings and additional supplemental tests/information. Your healthcare providers will explain the meaning of your tests results, based on the overall clinical scenario.

Additional and Relevant Useful Information:

  • Many laboratories may not have the capability to perform this test. Only highly-specialized labs with advanced facilities and testing procedures may perform this test
  • Additional mutations are still being discovered in many of these tumors. This may further contribute towards tumor diagnosis and treatment. Please consult with your healthcare provider for any information updates

Certain medications that you may be currently taking may influence the outcome of the test. Hence, it is important to inform your healthcare provider of the complete list of medications (including any herbal supplements) you are currently taking. This will help the healthcare provider interpret your test results more accurately and avoid unnecessary chances of a misdiagnosis.

What are some Useful Resources for Additional Information?

Please visit our Laboratory Procedures Center for more physician-approved health information:


References and Information Sources used for the Article:

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/testing/genetictesting (accessed on 03/07/2017)

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5806a1.htm (accessed on 03/07/2017)

http://www.nature.com/gim/journal/v10/n5/full/gim200852a.html (accessed on 03/07/2017)

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/106/6/1494 (accessed on 03/07/2017)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385272/ (accessed on 03/18/2017)

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/uterine-sarcoma/about/what-is-uterine-sarcoma.html (accessed on 03/18/2017)

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sarcoma/2010/353679/ (accessed on 03/18/2017)

https://radiopaedia.org/articles/endometrial-stromal-tumours-1 (accessed on 03/18/2017)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133706 (accessed on 03/18/2017)

http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Tumors/EndometStromalSarcYWHAE-NUTM2ID6649.html (accessed on 03/18/2017)

Helpful Peer-Reviewed Medical Articles:

Carrano, A. V., et al. Measurement and purification of human chromosomes by flow cytometry and sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 76, 1382–1384 (1979)

Drets, M. E., & Shaw, M. W. Specific banding patterns of human chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 68, 2073–2077 (1971)

Druker, B. J. Perspectives on the development of a molecularly targeted agent. Cancer Cell 1, 31–36 (2002)

Parra, I., & Windle, B. High resolution visual mapping of stretched DNA by fluorescent hybridization. Nature Genetics 5, 17–21 (1993) doi:10.1038/ng0993-17

Pinkel, D., et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nature Genetics 20, 207–211 (1998) doi:10.1038/2524

Speicher, M. R., et al. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nature Genetics 12, 368–375 (1996) doi:10.1038/ng0496-368

Nucci, M. R., Harburger, D., Koontz, J., Dal Cin, P., & Sklar, J. (2007). Molecular analysis of the JAZF1-JJAZ1 gene fusion by RT-PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization in endometrial stromal neoplasms. The American journal of surgical pathology, 31(1), 65-70.

Kurihara, S., Oda, Y., Ohishi, Y., Iwasa, A., Takahira, T., Kaneki, E., ... & Tsuneyoshi, M. (2008). Endometrial stromal sarcomas and related high-grade sarcomas: immunohistochemical and molecular genetic study of 31 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology, 32(8), 1228-1238.

Huang, H. Y., Ladanyi, M., & Soslow, R. A. (2004). Molecular detection of JAZF1-JJAZ1 gene fusion in endometrial stromal neoplasms with classic and variant histology: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. The American journal of surgical pathology, 28(2), 224-232.

Nucci, M. R., O'connell, J. T., Huettner, P. C., Cviko, A., Sun, D., & Quade, B. J. (2001). h-Caldesmon expression effectively distinguishes endometrial stromal tumors from uterine smooth muscle tumors. The American journal of surgical pathology, 25(4), 455-463.

Antonescu, C. R., Sung, Y. S., Chen, C. L., Zhang, L., Chen, H. W., Singer, S., ... & Fletcher, C. D. (2014). Novel ZC3H7B‐BCOR, MEAF6‐PHF1, and EPC1‐PHF1 fusions in ossifying fibromyxoid tumors—molecular characterization shows genetic overlap with endometrial stromal sarcoma. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 53(2), 183-193.

Micci, F., Walter, C. U., Teixeira, M. R., Panagopoulos, I., Bjerkehagen, B., Sæter, G., & Heim, S. (2003). Cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses of endometrial stromal sarcoma: nonrandom involvement of chromosome arms 6p and 7p and confirmation of JAZF1/JJAZ1 gene fusion in t (7; 17). Cancer genetics and cytogenetics, 144(2), 119-124.

Micci, F., Panagopoulos, I., Bjerkehagen, B., & Heim, S. (2006). Consistent rearrangement of chromosomal band 6p21 with generation of fusion genes JAZF1/PHF1 and EPC1/PHF1 in endometrial stromal sarcoma. Cancer research, 66(1), 107-112.

Lee, C. H., Ou, W. B., Mariño-Enriquez, A., Zhu, M., Mayeda, M., Wang, Y., ... & West, R. B. (2012). 14-3-3 fusion oncogenes in high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(3), 929-934.

Lee, C. H., Mariño-Enriquez, A., Ou, W., Zhu, M., Ali, R. H., Chiang, S., ... & Debiec-Rychter, M. (2012). The clinicopathologic features of YWHAE-FAM22 endometrial stromal sarcomas: a histologically high-grade and clinically aggressive tumor. The American journal of surgical pathology, 36(5), 641-653.

Reich, O., & Regauer, S. (2007). Hormonal therapy of endometrial stromal sarcoma. Current opinion in oncology, 19(4), 347-352.

Reviewed and Approved by a member of the DoveMed Editorial Board
First uploaded: April 3, 2017
Last updated: April 3, 2017