Please Remove Adblock
Adverts are the main source of Revenue for DoveMed. Please remove adblock to help us create the best medical content found on the Internet.

Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue

Last updated March 7, 2017

Approved by: Maulik P. Purohit MD MPH

Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue is a genetic test that is helpful in aiding a diagnosis of myolipoma of soft tissue.

What are other Names for this Test? (Equivalent Terms)

  • Gene Mutation Analysis for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue
  • Test for Molecular Diagnosis of Myolipoma of Soft Tissue

What is Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue? (Background Information)

  • Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue is a genetic test that is helpful in aiding a diagnosis of myolipoma of soft tissue. The lab test results may also be subsequently useful in taking appropriate treatment decisions
  • Myolipoma of soft tissue is a rare tumor that is a combination of benign fatty tissue and benign smooth muscle proliferation
  • These painless, slow-growing tumors are frequently found in the abdomen and pelvis of older women, where it may grow to large sizes
  • Myolipoma does not cause any significant sign or symptom, unless the tumor starts compressing adjoining organs. It may be diagnosed through imaging studies and a tissue biopsy

The cause of myolipoma of soft tissue is due to genetic mutations. Currently, studies indicate defects in the following gene:

  • HMGA2

The above genetic abnormality can be detected using molecular studies, which may play a significant role in identifying the tumor type, and in some cases, helping the healthcare provider take appropriate treatment decisions.

The molecular testing, in general, can be performed using a variety of methods. Some of these methods include:

  • In situ hybridization technique, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS)
  • Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
  • Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)
  • Karyotyping including spectral karyotyping
  • mRNA analysis
  • Tissue microarrays (TMAs)
  • Southern blot test
  • Northern blot test
  • Western blot test
  • Eastern blot test

The methodology used for myolipoma of soft tissue may vary from one laboratory to another. 

Note: Molecular testing has limitations due to the molecular method and genetic mutational abnormalities being tested. This can affect the results on a case-by-case basis. Consultation with your healthcare provider will help in determining the right test and right molecular method, based on individual circumstances.

What are the Clinical Indications for performing the Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue Test?

Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue is undertaken in the following situations: 

  • To assist (and in some cases, confirm) the initial diagnosis of myolipoma of soft tissue
  • To distinguish other tumors/conditions that have similar histological features, when examined by a pathologist under the microscope
  • To help in determining treatment options
  • To confirm recurrence of the tumor: Tumor recurrence can either be at the original tumor site, or at a distant location (away from the initial site)

How is the Specimen Collected for Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue?

Following is the specimen collection process for Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue:

The specimen sample requirements may vary from lab to lab. Hence, it is important to contact the testing lab for exact specimen requirements, before initiating the testing process.

  • Sample required:
    • Fresh tumor tissue during biopsy
    • Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded solid tumor tissue (FFPE tumor tissue), often referred to as paraffin block of the tumor
    • Unstained tissue slides
  • Process of obtaining the sample: As outlined by the laboratory testing facility
  • Preparation required: As outlined by the laboratory testing facility


  • Depending on the location of testing, it may take up to 2 weeks’ turnaround time, to obtain the test results
  • Occasionally, additional samples may be required to either repeat the test or to perform follow-up testing
  • Many hospitals preserve the paraffin blocks for at least 7 years. In general, older paraffin blocks (over 5 years) may affect the detection of specific mutations, due to degradation of the tumor specimen over time

Cost of Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue:

  • The cost of the test procedure depends on a variety of factors, such as the type of your health insurance, annual deductibles, co-pay requirements, out-of-network and in-network of your healthcare providers and healthcare facilities
  • In many cases, an estimate may be provided before the test is conducted. The final amount may depend upon the findings during the test procedure and post-operative care that is necessary (if any)

What is the Significance of the Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue Result?

The significance of Molecular Testing for Myolipoma of Soft Tissue is explained:

  • Presence of a positive test result helps aid, and in some cases, confirm the diagnosis of myolipoma of soft tissue
  • The result can help exclude other tumors with similar histological features
  • It can help determine the prognosis of the patient
  • In some cases, the test results may help in taking treatment decisions

The laboratory test results are NOT to be interpreted as results of a "stand-alone" test. The test results have to be interpreted after correlating with suitable clinical findings and additional supplemental tests/information. Your healthcare providers will explain the meaning of your tests results, based on the overall clinical scenario.

Additional and Relevant Useful Information:

  • Many laboratories may not have the capability to perform this test. Only highly-specialized labs with advanced facilities and testing procedures may perform this test
  • Additional mutations are still being discovered in many of these tumors. This may further contribute towards tumor diagnosis and treatment. Please consult with your healthcare provider for any information updates

Certain medications that you may be currently taking may influence the outcome of the test. Hence, it is important to inform your healthcare provider of the complete list of medications (including any herbal supplements) you are currently taking. This will help the healthcare provider interpret your test results more accurately and avoid unnecessary chances of a misdiagnosis.

What are some Useful Resources for Additional Information?

The following DoveMed website link is a useful resource for additional information:


Please visit our Laboratory Procedures Center for more physician-approved health information:


References and Information Sources used for the Article:

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/testing/genetictesting (accessed on 02/17/2017)

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5806a1.htm (accessed on 02/17/2017)

http://www.nature.com/gim/journal/v10/n5/full/gim200852a.html (accessed on 02/17/2017)

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/106/6/1494 (accessed on 02/17/2017)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746792/ (accessed on 02/17/2017)

http://ctgt.net/ (accessed on 02/17/2017)

http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/rg.245045120 (accessed on 02/17/2017)

Helpful Peer-Reviewed Medical Articles:

Carrano, A. V., et al. Measurement and purification of human chromosomes by flow cytometry and sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 76, 1382–1384 (1979)

Drets, M. E., & Shaw, M. W. Specific banding patterns of human chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 68, 2073–2077 (1971)

Druker, B. J. Perspectives on the development of a molecularly targeted agent. Cancer Cell 1, 31–36 (2002)

Parra, I., & Windle, B. High resolution visual mapping of stretched DNA by fluorescent hybridization. Nature Genetics 5, 17–21 (1993) doi:10.1038/ng0993-17

Pinkel, D., et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nature Genetics 20, 207–211 (1998) doi:10.1038/2524

Speicher, M. R., et al. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nature Genetics 12, 368–375 (1996) doi:10.1038/ng0496-368

Lee, Y. S., Park, S. E., Lee, J. U., & Choi, E. S. (2011). MRI of a Subcutaneous Myolipoma in the Ankle: a Case Report. Korean journal of radiology, 12(5), 641-645.

Ulu, E. M., Kirbaş, I., Töre, H. G., Başaran, C., Oztürk, A., Güven, G., ... & Coşkun, M. (2010). Extraperitoneal pelvic myolipoma. Diagn Interv Radiol, 16, 227-231.

Wardelmann, E., Chemnitz, J. M., & Wendtner, C. (2012). Targeted therapy of soft tissue sarcomas. Oncology Research and Treatment, 35(Suppl. 1), 21-27.

Davies, C. E., Davies, A. M., Kindblom, L. G., & James, S. L. (2010, June). Soft tissue tumors with muscle differentiation. In Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology (Vol. 14, No. 02, pp. 245-256). © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Shin, N. Y., Kim, M. J., Chung, J. J., Chung, Y. E., Choi, J. Y., & Park, Y. N. (2010). The differential imaging features of fat-containing tumors in the peritoneal cavity and retroperitoneum: the radiologic-pathologic correlation. Korean journal of Radiology, 11(3), 333-345.

Kim, H. S., Kim, S., Kim, K., Choi, K. U., & Kim, J. Y. (2013). Myolipoma of mesentery: a case report. Case reports in pathology, 2013.

Bindra, R., Gupta, S., Gupta, N., Asotra, S., & Sharma, A. (2010). Ancient schwannoma of the neck mimicking soft tissue sarcoma. Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, 6(2), 234.

Patel, R. D., Vanikar, A. V., & Modi, P. R. (2011). Giant lipoma of the adrenal gland: a case report. Journal of medical case reports, 5(1), 78.

Kang, T. Y., Huh, M. R., & Kim, S. J. (2012). Anal myolipoma: a new benign entity in patients with an anal tumor?. Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology, 28(4), 219-221.

Stalley, P. D., Coggins, K., & Cato, J. A. (2010, November). Biopsy of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: pitfalls. In Cancer Forum (Vol. 34, No. 3, p. 161). The Cancer Council Australia.

Reviewed and Approved by a member of the DoveMed Editorial Board
First uploaded: March 7, 2017
Last updated: March 7, 2017