What are other Names for this Test? (Equivalent Terms)
- Gene Mutation Analysis for Cellular Angiofibroma
- Molecular Testing for CA
- Test for Molecular Diagnosis of Cellular Angiofibroma
What is Molecular Testing for Cellular Angiofibroma? (Background Information)
- Molecular Testing for Cellular Angiofibroma is a genetic test that is helpful in aiding a diagnosis of cellular angiofibroma. The lab test results may also be subsequently useful in taking appropriate treatment decisions
- Cellular angiofibroma (CA) is a rare, benign soft tissue tumor that is seen to originate below the skin in the pelvic region in adults i.e., the vulva in women and near the scrotum/testis in men. These tumors are mostly seen in middle-aged and older adults
- They are generally painless and may remain undetected due to a lack of significant signs and symptoms. However, some CA tumors are known to grow to large sizes and cause pain and compression of adjoining organs
The cause of cellular angiofibroma is due to genetic mutations; however, the exact genetic mechanism causing the tumor is not yet identified. Currently, studies indicate the following defects:
- Partial monosomy 13q: A loss of a part or all of the long arm (q) of chromosome 13
- Partial monosomy 16q: A loss of a part or all of the long arm (q) of chromosome 16
The above genetic abnormalities can be detected using molecular studies, which may play a significant role in identifying the tumor type, and in some cases, helping the healthcare provider take appropriate treatment decisions.
The molecular testing, in general, can be performed using a variety of methods. Some of these methods include:
- In situ hybridization technique, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS)
- Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
- Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)
- Karyotyping including spectral karyotyping
- mRNA analysis
- Tissue microarrays (TMAs)
- Southern blot test
- Northern blot test
- Western blot test
- Eastern blot test
The methodology used for cellular angiofibroma may vary from one laboratory to another.
Note: Molecular testing has limitations due to the molecular method and genetic mutational abnormalities being tested. This can affect the results on a case-by-case basis. Consultation with your healthcare provider will help in determining the right test and right molecular method, based on individual circumstances.
What are the Clinical Indications for performing the Molecular Testing for Cellular Angiofibroma Test?
Molecular Testing for Cellular Angiofibroma is undertaken in the following situations:
- To assist (and in some cases, confirm) the initial diagnosis of cellular angiofibroma
- To distinguish other tumors/conditions that have similar histological features, when examined by a pathologist under the microscope
- To help in determining treatment options
- To confirm recurrence of the tumor: Tumor recurrence can either be at the original tumor site, or at a distant location (away from the initial site)
How is the Specimen Collected for Molecular Testing for Cellular Angiofibroma?
Following is the specimen collection process for Molecular Testing for Cellular Angiofibroma:
The specimen sample requirements may vary from lab to lab. Hence, it is important to contact the testing lab for exact specimen requirements, before initiating the testing process.
- Sample required:
- Fresh tumor tissue during biopsy
- Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded solid tumor tissue (FFPE tumor tissue), often referred to as paraffin block of the tumor
- Unstained tissue slides
- Process of obtaining the sample: As outlined by the laboratory testing facility
- Preparation required: As outlined by the laboratory testing facility
- Depending on the location of testing, it may take up to 2 weeks’ turnaround time, to obtain the test results
- Occasionally, additional samples may be required to either repeat the test or to perform follow-up testing
- Many hospitals preserve the paraffin blocks for at least 7 years. In general, older paraffin blocks (over 5 years) may affect the detection of specific mutations, due to degradation of the tumor specimen over time
Cost of Molecular Testing for Cellular Angiofibroma:
- The cost of the test procedure depends on a variety of factors, such as the type of your health insurance, annual deductibles, co-pay requirements, out-of-network and in-network of your healthcare providers and healthcare facilities
- In many cases, an estimate may be provided before the test is conducted. The final amount may depend upon the findings during the test procedure and post-operative care that is necessary (if any)
What is the Significance of the Molecular Testing for Cellular Angiofibroma Result?
The significance of Molecular Testing for Cellular Angiofibroma is explained:
- Presence of a positive test result helps aid, and in some cases, confirm the diagnosis of cellular angiofibroma
- The result can help exclude other tumors with similar histological features
- It can help determine the prognosis of the patient
- In some cases, the test results may help in taking treatment decisions
The laboratory test results are NOT to be interpreted as results of a "stand-alone" test. The test results have to be interpreted after correlating with suitable clinical findings and additional supplemental tests/information. Your healthcare providers will explain the meaning of your tests results, based on the overall clinical scenario.
Additional and Relevant Useful Information:
- Many laboratories may not have the capability to perform this test. Only highly-specialized labs with advanced facilities and testing procedures may perform this test
- Additional mutations are still being discovered in many of these tumors. This may further contribute towards tumor diagnosis and treatment. Please consult with your healthcare provider for any information updates
Certain medications that you may be currently taking may influence the outcome of the test. Hence, it is important to inform your healthcare provider of the complete list of medications (including any herbal supplements) you are currently taking. This will help the healthcare provider interpret your test results more accurately and avoid unnecessary chances of a misdiagnosis.
What are some Useful Resources for Additional Information?
The following DoveMed website link is a useful resource for additional information:
Please visit our Laboratory Procedures Center for more physician-approved health information:
References and Information Sources used for the Article:
https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/testing/genetictesting (accessed on 02/17/2017)
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5806a1.htm (accessed on 02/17/2017)
http://www.nature.com/gim/journal/v10/n5/full/gim200852a.html (accessed on 02/17/2017)
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/106/6/1494 (accessed on 02/17/2017)
http://www.nature.com/modpathol/journal/v24/n1/full/modpathol2010170a.html (accessed on 02/17/2017)
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cripa/2014/871530/ (accessed on 02/17/2017)
http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4228015 (accessed on 02/17/2017)
Helpful Peer-Reviewed Medical Articles:
Carrano, A. V., et al. Measurement and purification of human chromosomes by flow cytometry and sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 76, 1382–1384 (1979)
Drets, M. E., & Shaw, M. W. Specific banding patterns of human chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 68, 2073–2077 (1971)
Druker, B. J. Perspectives on the development of a molecularly targeted agent. Cancer Cell 1, 31–36 (2002)
Parra, I., & Windle, B. High resolution visual mapping of stretched DNA by fluorescent hybridization. Nature Genetics 5, 17–21 (1993) doi:10.1038/ng0993-17
Pinkel, D., et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nature Genetics 20, 207–211 (1998) doi:10.1038/2524
Speicher, M. R., et al. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nature Genetics 12, 368–375 (1996) doi:10.1038/ng0496-368
Flucke, U., Van Krieken, J. H. J., & Mentzel, T. (2011). Cellular angiofibroma: analysis of 25 cases emphasizing its relationship to spindle cell lipoma and mammary-type myofibroblastoma. Modern Pathology, 24(1), 82-89.
Chen, E., & Fletcher, C. D. (2010). Cellular angiofibroma with atypia or sarcomatous transformation: clinicopathologic analysis of 13 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology, 34(5), 707-714.
Mariño-Enríquez, A., & Fletcher, C. D. (2012). Angiofibroma of soft tissue: clinicopathologic characterization of a distinctive benign fibrovascular neoplasm in a series of 37 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology, 36(4), 500-508.
Magro, G., Righi, A., Casorzo, L., Antonietta, T., Salvatorelli, L., Kacerovská, D., ... & Michal, M. (2012). Mammary and vaginal myofibroblastomas are genetically related lesions: fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis shows deletion of 13q14 region. Human pathology, 43(11), 1887-1893.
Cheah, A. L., Billings, S. D., Goldblum, J. R., Carver, P., Tanas, M. Z., & Rubin, B. P. (2014). STAT6 rabbit monoclonal antibody is a robust diagnostic tool for the distinction of solitary fibrous tumour from its mimics. Pathology, 46(5), 389-395.
Edgar, M. A., Lauer, S. R., Bridge, J. A., & Rizzo, M. (2013). Soft tissue angiofibroma: report of 2 cases of a recently described tumor. Human pathology, 44(3), 438-441.
Mandato, V. D., Santagni, S., Cavazza, A., Aguzzoli, L., Abrate, M., & La Sala, G. B. (2015). Cellular angiofibroma in women: a review of the literature. Diagnostic pathology, 10(1), 114.
Doyle, L. A., Vivero, M., Fletcher, C. D., Mertens, F., & Hornick, J. L. (2014). Nuclear expression of STAT6 distinguishes solitary fibrous tumor from histologic mimics. Modern Pathology, 27(3), 390-395.
Howitt, B. E., & Fletcher, C. D. (2016). Mammary-type myofibroblastoma: clinicopathologic characterization in a series of 143 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology, 40(3), 361-367.
Bokhari, K., Manikandan, L., Mohammad, A., Shahul, M., Bagi, M. A., & Kotan, Z. (2012). Cellular angiofibroma of the buccal mucosa: A rare case report and review of literature. International Journal of Experimental Dental Science, 1(1), 23-25.